Thursday, November 5, 2020

responding to emails

As this is written, there's still no winner in the presidential contest and we are all the losers for that fact. In the following, the quoted portions have been anonymized.


On Thursday, November 5, 2020, 9:24:23 AM EST, XXXX wrote:

 >The nation is in decline and has been declining for a while. 

That's partly true, but there are a few hopeful signs amid all the destruction, which I'll get to below.


>Adversity breeds innovation and oppression begets heroism.

Agreed, and in a capitalistic business sense, I think things will explode no matter who gets elected.  The economy is ready to go; government just needs to get out of the way.  With the Senate unlikely to given its okay to huge tax increases, if the artificial restraints of Covid lockdowns are swept away, we will be on fire in 2021 and beyond.  That's one positive that I see in the election.

Another is the repudiation of the progressive nonsense.  Nationwide, the dims thought the progressive agenda was the way to go.  The state, congressional and senatorial races tell a different story.  Rather than increase their seats in the House, they're losing seats.  That's another positive I see in the ashes of this mess.  The Squad will fade, as will Antifa and BLM.  They were always niche and will be dropped now that they've been shown to be powerless in terms of building a lasting and effective movement. 

One negative, and it's a big one, is that if Trump ultimately is forced from office, it will be proof of Goebbels' adage about telling a big lie often enough that it becomes the truth.  For four years Trump has had to withstand a constant unrelenting stream of abuse from all corridors and it looks like people believed it.  That means he loses mostly because of his STYLE, not his substance.  His achievements within the realm of government are astounding, but he was attacked 24/7 with lies about white supremacy, antisemitism, Russian collusion and so forth, and that has apparently made a difference.  Nobody loves Joe Biden, but they've been taught to hate Donald Trump.  It's a shame that style trumps substance, but apparently it does.  The media will be emboldened to try it again and they will.  That's a huge negative coming out of Trump's time in office, though on the bright side, he has exposed the media for the liars they are. 


>perhaps it is good to hasten decline and not forestall it. 

Again, agreed.  The John Gault response seems appropriate if Biden takes office: just refuse to participate to the extent possible.  It's easier for me, admittedly, since I'm not really working, to give government as little tax as possible.  Income sheltering, using cash, staying local and not buying trash we don't need are all more or less permanent parts of our lifestyle.  If the productive people opt out of the economy, Rand had it right.  The takers and parasites will drown because they don't produce anything.  As one example, if we all just signed out of FaceBook and never signed back in the company would go out of business as their advertisers lost faith in them and the data buyers found that the information they bought about us was useless since we didn't respond to their emails and targeted ads.

If Biden steals the presidency, then simply refusing to participate in the tech giants' wares will be one easy, legal way to fight back.  It's also something I personally do anyway to the extent possible. (Yes, I'm aware of the hypocrisy of being on Instagram and using Amazon to publish my book.  I don't have a solution to those things yet).

>To the firm establishment of this idea we owe the peaceful succession and mild >administration of European monarchies.  (from Gibbon's "Decline and Fall..."

In light of two world wars and other European nonsense, I'd say that history has at least partially repudiated Gibbon.  On the other hand, I've never read him so maybe I should reserve judgment.

No comments:

Blog Archive